Stay Updated on Crypto Compliance & Crypto Regulation in the EU

Today, the European Banking Authority (EBA) released an explainer entitled Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing in the EU’s Crypto-Assets Sector. As the crypto landscape evolves, the EU is tightening its grip on compliance with the introduction of MiCAR (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) and its accompanying AML/CFT rules, including the Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR).

One common misconception among crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) is that MiCAR includes a “grandfathering” exemption under the new European Travel Rule. 

Let’s set the record straight: this is definitively not the case.

▶︎ Watch this special video message from Lana Schwartzman, Head of Regulatory & Compliance at Notabene, explaining why compliance with TFR is so important, as what consequences may face CASPs that fail to comply.

What Does Article 143(3) of MiCAR Really Say?

The much-discussed Article 143(3) states:

“Crypto-asset service providers that provided their services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024, may continue to do so until 1 July 2026 or until they are granted or refused an authorization pursuant to Article 63, whichever is sooner.”

At first glance, this might appear to grant a blanket reprieve for CASPs operating before the cut-off date. In reality, the provision is far more limited in scope.

What This Provision Actually Means

While this transitional clause provides a limited window for CASPs to continue operating while applying for MiCAR authorization, it is not a free pass to avoid compliance. CASPs operating under existing frameworks—such as AMLD (Anti-Money Laundering Directive) or domestic AML/CFT regimes—must still adhere to all applicable AML/CFT requirements and that includes the Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, also know as the Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR).

In simple terms:

• Yes, CASPs can keep operating during the transitional period.
• No, this does not exempt them from complying with the updated AML/CFT framework (including TFR).

The same stringent rules that apply to credit and financial institutions also apply to “grandfathered” CASPs.

The Travel Rule is Here to Stay

A major component of these regulations is the European Travel Rule, requiring CASPs to ensure that crypto transfers include comprehensive information about both originators and beneficiaries with the goal of preventing illicit activities like money laundering and terrorist financing in the crypto ecosystem and reporting it. This rule is non-negotiable and applies equally to CASPs during the transitional period.

Furthermore, CASPs engaging in transactions with self-hosted wallets or operating across borders will need to implement robust measures to trace and verify transfers.

Why Compliance Matters Now

While the transitional period may offer some operational flexibility, CASPs that delay in meeting compliance requirements risk jeopardizing their long-term viability. Here’s why:

• Increased Scrutiny: The EBA and upcoming EU AML Authority are tasked with enforcing strict compliance.
• Reputation at Stake: Operating without adherence to AML/CFT standards could harm trust with customers, partners, and regulators. As a matter of fact, we published earlier this year the results of our State of Crypto Travel Rule Report which showed from the survey that 66% of VASPs restrict withdrawals that do not comply with Travel Rule requirements
• Operational Risks: Failure to comply could lead to service suspension, fines, or denial of authorization.

For more on the risks of not complying with TFR, read our recent article on the Consequences of Non-Compliance with EU's Travel Rule After December 30th.

The Path Forward for CASPs

For CASPs looking to thrive under the new regime:

1. Act Now: Begin implementing Travel Rule solutions and robust AML/CFT measures immediately.
2. Understand the Framework: Familiarize yourself with MiCAR, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, and the EBA Travel Rule Guidelines.
3. Prepare for Licensing: Gather the necessary documentation and establish a compliance-first culture to streamline your MiCAR authorization process.

Debunking the Myth

The takeaway is clear: there is no blanket “grandfathering clause” exempting CASPs from compliance. The transitional provision simply ensures continuity while maintaining full AML/CFT obligations.

As the compliance deadline of December 30, 2024 approaches, proactive measures will separate the leaders from those left scrambling to catch up. The time to act is now—ensure your operations are Travel Rule-ready and compliant with the evolving regulatory landscape.

Let’s work together to build a safe, compliant, and thriving crypto ecosystem in the EU. 🌍

As the EU’s Travel Rule regulations continue to advance, other global regions are beginning to feel the ripple effects. The Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR), notably Regulation (EU) 1113/2023, sets stringent requirements on crypto asset service providers (CASPs) within the EU to mitigate risks of money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes. 

Yet, the effects of these rules extend beyond EU borders, influencing jurisdictions worldwide as they adapt to the standards set forth by these robust regulations.

Let’s have a look at some of the ways the EU’s TFR could impact regions globally.

A Surge in Global Compliance Demand

North America

VASPs in the US and Canada are closely observing the EU’s strict stance, with regulators considering updates or FAQs to enhance their own frameworks. The EU’s Travel Rule has set a benchmark, making it difficult for non-compliant entities to serve EU-based customers without adhering to similar standards.

Asia-Pacific

Countries like Singapore and Japan, which have already implemented Travel Rule provisions, are likely to refine their compliance measures further to align with EU requirements. This is especially important as EU-based financial institutions increasingly demand verification of counterparties in these regions.

Strengthening Due Diligence and AML Practices

The EU’s TFR mandates comprehensive due diligence for CASPs, which has led other jurisdictions to adopt or enhance similar anti-money laundering (AML) practices. For instance, LATAM countries, particularly those with high remittance flows, are tightening scrutiny on VASP activities to align with FATF recommendations and TFR influences.

For example, according to Reuters, Argentina’s cryptocurrency transactions have surged to $85.4 billion in the past year, raising concerns about money laundering. In response, the government is implementing new regulations, including a July 2024 fiscal package offering tax amnesty for individuals declaring up to $100,000 in registered crypto assets. This initiative aims to align with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards and prevent Argentina from being placed on the FATF’s grey list, which could deter foreign investment and harm the economy. Additionally, the government is amending laws related to money laundering and reporting entities to strengthen oversight of the crypto market. Regionally, the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), comprising 18 countries from South, Central, and North America, is enhancing anti-money laundering frameworks to align with global standards.

These efforts ensure that transactions from different regions meet EU standards, thereby reinforcing global AML practices.

Influencing Emerging Economies and Adoption Challenges

For emerging markets, particularly in Africa, the drive toward compliance is becoming essential as EU-based users and entities prefer to transact only with VASPs in compliance with their own regulatory standards. 

This could either foster rapid compliance adoption or limit market access for non-compliant VASPs in these regions. This was also noted in our State of Crypto Travel Rule Report where survey results showed that VASPs are increasingly intolerant towards transacting with counterparties that do not comply with the Travel Rule. In fact, over 66% of VASPs somehow restrict withdrawals that don't comply with Travel Rule requirements.

In Nigeria, a leading African cryptocurrency market, VASPs face pressure to align with international standards to maintain global market access. In December 2023, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) issued guidelines for VASPs, lifting a two-year restriction on financial institutions operating accounts for cryptocurrency service providers or processing crypto-related transactions. However, smaller VASPs often struggle with the financial and operational burdens of compliance, creating a dichotomy:

• Rapid Compliance Adoption: VASPs that can afford necessary compliance measures may gain a competitive advantage by attracting EU-based clients and partners, thereby expanding their market reach.
• Limited Market Access: Conversely, VASPs unable to meet these standards risk exclusion from transactions with EU entities, limiting their growth potential.

This dynamic underscores the importance for African VASPs to invest in compliance infrastructure. While initial costs may be high, the long-term benefits include maintaining access to international markets, fostering trust with global partners, and enhancing the overall credibility of the African cryptocurrency market, which can attract more investors and users.

Increasing Demand for Compliance Technology

As VASPs worldwide aim to meet EU standards, the demand for compliance technology is surging. Many are adopting regtech solutions to streamline KYC, AML, and data-sharing processes, enabling efficient alignment with international standards, particularly for cross-border transactions. This trend is reshaping how global VASPs approach compliance.

The Road Ahead: Potential Challenges and Opportunities

The EU’s TFR is reshaping the regulatory landscape, creating both challenges and opportunities for global VASPs. Increased regulatory pressure may lead to market consolidation, where larger entities excel while smaller players struggle to adapt. However, harmonized regulations promise more secure, trustworthy global transactions, offering users a safer and more navigable digital asset ecosystem.

This evolving environment demands proactive investment in compliance solutions. For VASPs, adapting to these changes is not just a regulatory necessity—it’s an opportunity to enhance credibility, foster innovation, and help standardize the global digital transaction landscape.

If your business is located outside of the EU and you would like to speak with our team about implementing a TFR-compliant Travel Rule program, you can schedule a free demo of our solution at notabene.id/demo

Lately, we’ve been hearing a recurring question from our customers and prospects: Is the EU Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR) being postponed by six months? Let’s set the record straight.

The short answer: No, the TFR is not being delayed.

Understanding the Source of the Confusion

This misunderstanding likely stems from recent discussions around MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulatory technical standards (RTS). As members of BlockchainForEurope, we’ve joined others in addressing concerns about MiCA’s RTS and its implementation timeline. The letter we co-signed with other industry members highlights several key challenges that MiCA introduces, including:

1. Timing and Legal Uncertainty: With less than two months left before MiCA’s application on December 30, 2024, delays in RTS adoption have left both national competent authorities (NCAs) and CASPs scrambling to prepare.
2. Inconsistent Transitional Periods: Divergent “grandfathering” clauses across Member States create a compliance patchwork—5 months in Lithuania versus 18 months in France—undermining the intended harmonization.
3. Foreseeable Delays and Risks: Without coordinated measures, we risk regulatory uncertainty, market disruptions, and reputational harm, detracting from MiCA’s goals.
4. Operational Challenges: CASPs face impractical requirements, such as applying in all Member States, while some states have ceased accepting pre-MiCA applications.
5. Proposed Mitigations: The letter calls for ESMA to issue a “no action” letter to promote consistency among NCAs and extend transitional arrangements.

How Does This Relate to TFR?

It’s crucial to understand that MiCA and TFR are separate regulations. While MiCA includes transitional or “grandfathering” clauses for existing CASPs, the TFR does not.

For TFR, there is no "traditional" transitional period. Under the EBA Travel Rule Guidelines, until July 31, 2025, CASPs may exceptionally use infrastructures or services with technical limitations, but are required to implement additional technical steps to ensure full compliance with the requirements. This does not exempt them from Travel Rule compliance. CASPs using such infrastructures are required to take additional technical steps to ensure full compliance with the Travel Rule during this period. This means that all existing CASPs, regardless of their new status, must fully comply with the TFR requirements by the official application date. Any delays or mitigations proposed under MiCA will not directly impact TFR timelines.

Failing to comply with the TFR by the December 30, 2024, deadline carries serious consequences, including the potential for service disruptions, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties. We recently explored this topic in detail in our article: The Consequences of Non-Compliance with the EU’s Travel Rule After December 30th. If you’re preparing for compliance, it’s worth a read.

At Notabene, we’re committed to helping businesses navigate these regulatory complexities. If you have questions or concerns about preparing for the TFR, we’re here to help. Feel free to reach out to our Regulatory & Compliance team at [email protected]