By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.

The Myth is Finally Debunked: No Grandfathering Clause for the European Travel Rule

Lana Schwartzman
Lana Schwartzman
December 5, 2024
Schwartzman boasts 19 years of experience in fintech and digital assets compliance, with a strong history of designing compliance programs and leading licensure strategies in crypto and financial companies.
Summary
Contrary to common misconceptions, MiCAR’s transitional clause is not a blanket exemption from compliance. CASPs must adhere to the EU Travel Rule and other AML/CFT requirements during the transitional period. Learn why acting now is critical to avoiding operational, reputational, and regulatory risks as the December 30, 2024, compliance deadline approaches.

Today, the European Banking Authority (EBA) released an explainer entitled Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing in the EU’s Crypto-Assets Sector. As the crypto landscape evolves, the EU is tightening its grip on compliance with the introduction of MiCAR (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) and its accompanying AML/CFT rules, including the Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR).

One common misconception among crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) is that MiCAR includes a “grandfathering” exemption under the new European Travel Rule. 

Let’s set the record straight: this is definitively not the case.

What Does Article 143(3) of MiCAR Really Say?

The much-discussed Article 143(3) states:

“Crypto-asset service providers that provided their services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024, may continue to do so until 1 July 2026 or until they are granted or refused an authorization pursuant to Article 63, whichever is sooner.”

At first glance, this might appear to grant a blanket reprieve for CASPs operating before the cut-off date. In reality, the provision is far more limited in scope.

What This Provision Actually Means

While this transitional clause provides a limited window for CASPs to continue operating while applying for MiCAR authorization, it is not a free pass to avoid compliance. CASPs operating under existing frameworks—such as AMLD (Anti-Money Laundering Directive) or domestic AML/CFT regimes—must still adhere to all applicable AML/CFT requirements and that includes the Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, also know as the Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR).

In simple terms:

  • Yes, CASPs can keep operating during the transitional period.
  • No, this does not exempt them from complying with the updated AML/CFT framework (including TFR).

The same stringent rules that apply to credit and financial institutions also apply to “grandfathered” CASPs.

The Travel Rule is Here to Stay

A major component of these regulations is the European Travel Rule, requiring CASPs to ensure that crypto transfers include comprehensive information about both originators and beneficiaries with the goal of preventing illicit activities like money laundering and terrorist financing in the crypto ecosystem and reporting it. This rule is non-negotiable and applies equally to CASPs during the transitional period.

Furthermore, CASPs engaging in transactions with self-hosted wallets or operating across borders will need to implement robust measures to trace and verify transfers.

Why Compliance Matters Now

While the transitional period may offer some operational flexibility, CASPs that delay in meeting compliance requirements risk jeopardizing their long-term viability. Here’s why:

  • Increased Scrutiny: The EBA and upcoming EU AML Authority are tasked with enforcing strict compliance.
  • Reputation at Stake: Operating without adherence to AML/CFT standards could harm trust with customers, partners, and regulators. As a matter of fact, we published earlier this year the results of our State of Crypto Travel Rule Report which showed from the survey that 66% of VASPs restrict withdrawals that do not comply with Travel Rule requirements
  • Operational Risks: Failure to comply could lead to service suspension, fines, or denial of authorization.
Response to the survey question “How does your company currently handle withdrawals to VASPs that are not reachable through your Travel Rule solution/protocol?”
Response to the survey question “How does your company currently handle withdrawals to VASPs that are not reachable through your Travel Rule solution/protocol?”


For more on the risks of not complying with TFR, read our recent article on the Consequences of Non-Compliance with EU's Travel Rule After December 30th.

The Path Forward for CASPs

For CASPs looking to thrive under the new regime:

  1. Act Now: Begin implementing Travel Rule solutions and robust AML/CFT measures immediately.
  2. Understand the Framework: Familiarize yourself with MiCAR, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, and the EBA Travel Rule Guidelines.
  3. Prepare for Licensing: Gather the necessary documentation and establish a compliance-first culture to streamline your MiCAR authorization process.

Debunking the Myth

The takeaway is clear: there is no blanket “grandfathering clause” exempting CASPs from compliance. The transitional provision simply ensures continuity while maintaining full AML/CFT obligations.

As the compliance deadline of December 30, 2024 approaches, proactive measures will separate the leaders from those left scrambling to catch up. The time to act is now—ensure your operations are Travel Rule-ready and compliant with the evolving regulatory landscape.

Let’s work together to build a safe, compliant, and thriving crypto ecosystem in the EU. 🌍

References

FAQs