By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.

Why Email-Based Crypto Travel Rule Solutions Don’t Scale

The Notabene Team
The Notabene Team
January 16, 2025
A member of the Notabene team crafted this post.
Summary
Email-based Travel Rule solutions may appear simple, but they fall short in scalability, security, and efficiency—leaving VASPs struggling to handle rising transaction volumes and regulatory demands. This article dives into the limitations of email-based approaches, from operational bottlenecks and data privacy risks to poor user experience, and explores how modern, automated solutions offer a path to scalable and secure compliance.

As crypto compliance reaches its tipping point due to key jurisdictions enforcing Travel Rule regulations such as the European Union, Turkey, Seychelles, South Africa, and others – the Travel Rule has become a critical focus for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). The requirement to securely share and verify sender and recipient information along with crypto transactions is a foundational step toward fostering trust in the ecosystem. However, the methods employed to meet these requirements vary widely—and not all are sustainable.

One approach, the email-based method for data exchange, has gained traction among some platforms and VASPs. While this method might seem efficient on the surface, it faces significant scalability, security, and operational challenges that limit its effectiveness in the long term. 

Why do email-based solutions fall short? And what critical decisions should VASPs make in order to future-proof their compliance operations? 

Let's explore.

Operational Scalability: The Breaking Point

At the heart of the Travel Rule is the exchange of information between originating and beneficiary VASPs. Email-based systems satisfy this basic minimum requirement and typically follow a process like this:

  1. The originator VASP sends a notification email to the beneficiary VASP.
  2. The beneficiary receives the email, verifies their identity (often through a code or similar mechanism), and accesses the shared information.
  3. The information is presented in a downloadable file, such as a JSON object.

While this process may work for VASPs with low transaction volumes, its scalability crumbles under the real-world demands that come with substantial daily transaction volume:

  • Manual Verification: Each transaction requires individual attention, from opening emails to entering verification codes. For VASPs handling hundreds or thousands of transactions daily, this approach is operationally infeasible.
  • File Processing Overload: Beneficiaries often receive raw data files, leaving them responsible for integrating the information into their systems. This creates additional friction and inefficiency.
  • Lack of Automation: Without robust integration options, email-based solutions force compliance teams into repetitive manual workflows, increasing the risk of human error and missed deadlines.

In today’s fast-paced crypto environment, these limitations make it clear that email-based methods cannot support the industry’s growing needs.

Security and Privacy Risks

Another critical challenge for email-based solutions is ensuring data security and privacy—an area of increasing scrutiny in jurisdictions like the EU, where compliance is non-negotiable. Key concerns include:

  • Data Exposure: Email, while widely used, is not inherently secure. Even with encrypted attachments, the transmission of sensitive customer information via email introduces vulnerabilities.
  • PII Handling: Downloading and storing Personally Identifiable Information (PII) on local machines can lead to unintended breaches. Once the data leaves the secure confines of a system, it’s much harder to track and control.
  • End-to-End Encryption: True end-to-end encryption, where data is encrypted from the point of origin to its final destination, is often missing in email-based systems. This leaves a critical gap in protecting sensitive information.

In fact, email-based systems are particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks, making them a less secure option for handling sensitive information. According to a Forbes article, in 2023, more than 94% of organizations reported email security incidents.

Poor User Experience for Beneficiaries

While many email-based systems focus on the needs of the originating VASP, they often neglect the beneficiary’s experience. This creates friction and decreases the likelihood of successful data exchange:

  • Cumbersome Processes: Beneficiaries are required to open emails, verify their identity, and process files manually. For smaller VASPs with limited resources, this process can be overwhelming.
  • No Response Mechanism: Many email-based systems lack a way for beneficiaries to confirm or reject transactions, leaving originating VASPs in the dark about the status of their requests.
  • No process for handling missing information: These systems often fail to address scenarios where information is incomplete or inaccurate. Beneficiaries have no standardized way to request corrections or additional details, further complicating the process and risking regulatory non-compliance. This lack of flexibility increases frustration for compliance teams and hampers successful collaboration between VASPs.

The Path Forward: Scalable Alternatives

To overcome these challenges, VASPs need to embrace solutions designed for scalability, security, and efficiency. Key features of a robust Travel Rule compliance system include:

  • Automation: Eliminating manual processes through API integrations and automated workflows reduces friction and increases scalability.
  • Real-Time Verification: Direct communication between VASPs enables faster responses and better alignment with regulatory requirements.
  • End-to-End Encryption: Protecting data at every stage of the process ensures compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  • Feedback Mechanisms: Allowing beneficiaries to confirm or reject transactions creates a complete compliance loop, enhancing trust and transparency.

The Bottom Line

The crypto industry is at a crossroads. As compliance requirements become more stringent, the need for scalable, secure, and user-friendly solutions is greater than ever. 

Email-based Travel Rule solutions, while functional in limited scenarios, cannot support the industry’s growth or the regulatory demands of tomorrow. 

VASPs must prioritize modern, scalable platforms that address the full range of operational, security, and compliance needs. Now is not a time to settle for the bare minimum in terms of Travel Rule compliance, because security and scalability are not things you settle on. 

By considering needs beyond the most basic check-the-box requirements, VASPs can not only meet today’s compliance obligations but also build a foundation for a more efficient, secure, and compliant future for their business.

References

FAQs